Sustainable affordable housing: strategies for financing an inclusive energy transition

Sustainable affordable housing: strategies for financing an inclusive energy transition

Summary of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York report

Summary and highlights from the report released by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on how we can build sustainable, energy-efficient and climate resilient housing.

As global leaders increasingly acknowledge the imminent and long-term threats that climate change poses for our civilization, there have been efforts across the world to pass legislation that encourages climate action. The New York State’s Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) and New York City’s Local Law 97 (LL97) are two landmark legislations that mandate significant climate action. Each of them have established a set of goals and requirements, which if complied with, can accelerate New York's climate resiliency.

A series of goals and requirements established by the CLCPA (Source: Original Report)

Although the legislation is a step in the right direction, compliance with these laws will be particularly challenging for buildings housing low- and moderate-income New Yorkers. The 'Sustainable Affordable Housing Report' by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York came out with important recommendations for households, government agencies, nonprofits, and private operators, on how to comply easily with climate laws. These recommendations are paired with strategies for developing financial tools that accelerate the mission of decarbonization of built environment in New York. In this article, we will be highlighting some of the main recommendations of the report.

Scope of the Problem

"Over 6 million households in New York would need to transition to electric heating or low-carbon fuels to decarbonize, and over 700,000 would need to transition from electric resistance heat to heat pumps."

The report outlines the four main challenges that key actors would face, in implementing these decarbonization efforts:

  1. high costs of decarbonization and access to capital
  2. uncertainty and risk
  3. lack of common reporting methodologies
  4. lack of awareness and education.

Recommendations for countering high costs of decarbonization and increasing ease of access to capital

LOWER THE COST OF FINANCING DECARBONIZATION BY ADJUSTING UNDERWRITING:

PROVIDE TAX INCENTIVES AND REGULATORY RELIEF, PARTICULARLY TO EARLY ADOPTERS:

LEVERAGE POLICY- AND MISSION-MOTIVATED INVESTMENTS TO INCREASE SUPPLY OF CAPITAL:

Recommendations for countering the high perceived project risk

Recommendations to institute clear measurement standards

Increase awareness and education among all relevant stakeholders

There isn't enough private investment backing climate retrofits today. This model needs to change if the aggressive mission to decarbonize New York is to be realized. Besides that, there is a glaring lack of education and awareness about the profitability and need for climate retrofits. The paper recommends launching awareness and education campaigns for all relevant stakeholders. There needs to be a state wide effort, by both public and private actors, to educate the public on the dire need for decarbonization.

Find the full report here.