Part 6: Will more housing solve the affordable housing crisis?

Part 6: Will more housing solve the affordable housing crisis?

The final state we will be exploring the relationship between housing starts and low-income housing in is Texas. In Texas, about 49% of renting households are cost-burdened, suggesting there is still much to be done to make housing in the Lonestar state more affordable.

In fact, to afford a 2-bedroom apartment at the current market rate of $1087, a Texan household must work a total of 115 hours per week to make ends meet.

By the numbers

Between 1995 and 2014, the number of housing starts in Texas increased by 105%. However, the number of homes financed via LIHTC declined by 96% for the same period.

This suggests that while the construction of new homes in Texas has ramped up significantly in the past couple decades, this new construction has done little to mitigate the housing crisis facing the state.

In 1995, 36% of the housing starts in Texas were financed by LIHTC in an effort to increase the supply of affordable housing. However, in 2014, this figure fell to 0.6%.

Housing Starts and LIHTC Construction

Year New Privately Owned Housing Units Authorized Total Number of Low-Income Units
1995 31,281 11,447
1996 32,521 7,331
1997 40,245 5,922
1998 51,560 4,719
1999 40,715 6,179
2000 28,381 3,127
2001 33,958 5,734
2002 35,791 7,286
2003 37,455 10,283
2004 33,030 13,379
2005 38,671 12,416
2006 47,271 11,203
2007 53,196 12,135
2008 46,918 298
2009 15,837 2,318
2010 19,741 4,448
2011 30,417 7,091
2012 53,729 6,291
2013 53,615 2,987
2014 64,103 387

Evidently, the increase in new construction alone is not a viable policy solution to the housing affordability crisis facing the state of Texas.

As seen in Texas, Washington, California, and New York, increasing the number of housing starts does not necessarily equate to more housing that is affordable for low and middle income Americans. Next week, we will take a look at what policies on both a state and federal level can help create housing that is more affordable.